The aim of the present study of was to characterize patients with an initially normal (or minimal atherosclerosis) coronary angiography (CA) who underwent repeated CA during follow-up.
Between 2003 and 2015 12,197 patients underwent CA at our hospital. 3166 (26 %) patients (mean age 63.5 years ± 11.7; range 19-92) had normal coronary arteries. Of the initially normal patients, 227 patients (7.2%; 49.8% male, 50.2% female) underwent another CA after 3.7 ± 2.5 years where 159 patients again had normal arteries (mean age 63.8 ± 10.2; 45.9 % male) while 68 had progression to significant coronary artery disease (CAD; mean age 63.0 ± 11; 58.8% male; p=0.05 for sex). The indication for the second CA was a clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI; STEMI or NSTEMI) in 16/159 (10.1%) patients who still were not having significant CAD. These patients (9 female, 7 male) had the following final diagnoses: stresscardiomyopathy (5), type 2 AMI (5), perimyocarditis (3), early repolarization (1), and unknown (2). Of the 68 patients who had progression to at least one stenosis of ≥ 50% luminal narrowing at their second CA, 36 (53%) were treated with PCI. None of the clinical characteristics, including stress test results and indication, of the 227 patients presenting for a second CAG was predictive for significant CAD at the second CA.
An initially normal CA is significantly more common in females than in males in our cohort of > 12 000 patients. 7.2 % of patients with an initially normal CA undergo at least a second CA during follow-up. Of the patients with progression to CAD a high percentage (53%) had to be treated by PCI. Unfortunately, no clinical parameter was predictive for significant findings at the second CA and thus second CA was hardly to be judged unnecessary.