Prospective, Large-Scale Multicenter Trial for the Use of Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) in Coronary Lesions: The DCB-Only All Comer Registry

author.DisplayName 1 author.DisplayName 2 author.DisplayName 3 author.DisplayName 4 author.DisplayName 5 author.DisplayName 6 author.DisplayName 7 author.DisplayName 7 author.DisplayName 8 author.DisplayName 9 author.DisplayName 10 author.DisplayName 11 author.DisplayName 11 author.DisplayName 12 author.DisplayName 13 author.DisplayName 1
1Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
2Cardiology, Elblandklinikum, Germany
3Cardiology, Albert Schweitzer Hopital, France
4Cardiology, CH Gonesse, France
5Cardiology, CHU Montpellier, France
6Cardiology, HIA Toulon, France
7Cardiology, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio, Italy
8Cardiology, Pantai Hospital Ayer Keroh, Malaysia
9Cardiology, The National Heart Institute of Malaysia, Malaysia
10Cardiology, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
11Cardiology, Pusat Perutban Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia
12Cardiology, Hospital Queen Elizabeth II, Malaysia
13Cardiology, Espirito Santo Evora, Portugal

Aims: The aim of this prospective, multicentre, international registry was to assess the safety and efficacy of a DCB-only strategy for the treatment of de-novo coronary lesions in an unselected all-comer patient population.

Methods and Results: We recruited 1025 patients with 1084 coronary lesions within vessels sized ≥2.0 and ≤4.0 mm and a lesion length of ≤25 mm. The average age of the study population was 64±11.2 years. Noteworthy was a high rate (44.3%) of patients with diabetes, acute coronary syndromes (26.9%) and complex type B2/C lesions (47.5%). DCB angioplasty was done predominantly for de-novo lesions (731 lesions or 67.7%). For comparison 112 lesions (10.3%) with in-stent restenosis (ISR) after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation and 241 lesions (22%) with ISR after treatment with drug eluting stents (DES) were also included. Additional BMS implantation was necessary in 54 patients and mainly occurred in the de-novo and BMS-ISR group (6.0% vs. 5.4% vs. 0.8%; p=0.004). After an average follow up of 8.7±1.8 months 29 patients had Re-PCI of the target lesion which corresponded to a TLR rate of 3.2%. Of note, TLR rate was highest among patients after DCB treatment of a DES-ISR (5.8% vs. 2.3% vs. 2.9 %; p=0.049). In a secondary analysis the MACE rate in the overall population was 6.8% after 9 months. Again there was a trend for more adverse events in the DES-ISR group compared to DCB angioplasty for de-novo or BMS-ISR lesions (9.6% vs. 5.6% vs. 7.8%, p=0.131).

Conclusion: Given the low TLR and MACE rates our registry adds to the accumulating evidence that a DCB only therapy emerges as an attractive alternative to stents for the treatment of suitable de novo coronary lesions.









Powered by Eventact EMS