Impact of of Mitral Annulus Calcifications on Risk of Conduction Disturbances after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Yafim Brodov 1,2 Yafim Brodov 1,2 Konen Eli 1,2 David Samooha 1,2 Israel Barbash 1,2 Mattia Di Segni 1,2 Victor Guetta 1,2 Amit Segev 1,2 Ehud Regev 1,2 Fernando Chernomordik 1,2 Michael Glikson 2 Orly Goitein 1,2
1Leviev Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center
2Leviev Heart Institute, Sheba Medical center

Background:
The impact of mitral annular (MAC) on the risk of new conduction system disorders (CSD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear.

Methods:
168 consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (mean age 79 ± 7 y, 49 % male) with no baseline CSD, underwent CoreValve (n = 72) and Sapien valve (n = 96) implantation. Aortic and MAC calcium score was calculated from non-contrast ECG-gated chest CT scan using Agatston method. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the predictive value of each calcium location to predict a new CSD after adjustment for other clinical predictors such as age, gender, diabetes, renal failure, prior myocardial infarction, prior coronary bypass or type of implanted valve. P value < 0.1 was considered as statistically significant.

Results:
Seventy five patients developed persistent or transient CSD (46 had LBBB, 21 had complete AV block and 8 had both). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed infero-posterior MAC (OR = 3.0; p = 0.003), right coronary cusp calcium (OR = 2.2; p = 0.03) and antero-septal MAC (OR = 1.9; p = 0.058) were independent significant predictors of new CSD after adjustment for clinical predictors, while left coronary cusp (OR = 0.8; p = 0.4) and non-coronary cusp (OR = 0.5; p = 0.6) were not. The clinical co-founders were not associated with new CSD.

Conclusions:
Either MAC or right coronary cusp calcium should be considered as a risk marker for new CSD after TAVI.

Yafim Brodov
Yafim Brodov
מרכז רפואי שיבא תל השומר








Powered by Eventact EMS