Comparison of Systolic Blood Pressure Values Obtained by Photoplethysmography and by Korotkoff Sounds

Eran Shalom 1,3 Shlomo Engelberg 2 Elad Hirshtal 1 Yitzhak Yitzhaky 3 Itzchak Slotki 4 Shavit Linda 4 Meir Nitzan 1
1Department of Physics/Electro-Optics Engineering, Jerusalem College of Technology
2Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Jerusalem College of Technology
3The unit of Electro-Optics Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
4Department of Nephrology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Korotkoff-sounds based auscultatory sphygmomanometry is considered the gold-standard of non-invasive blood pressure measurement for the systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) can also be measured by using a pressure cuff and a photoplethysmographic (PPG) probe on a finger. In our study, we examined the accuracy of the PPG technique by comparing it to the auscultatory technique. SBP was measured by the Korotkoff sounds in two ways: by making use of an electronic recording of the sounds using a microphone (Kmic) and by having a trained observer use a stethoscope (Kobs). The PPG and the auscultatory techniques were compared by examining adult males aged 20–73 years. The average difference between the PPG-based SBP measurement and the Kmic SBP measurements was -0.1±1.84 mmHg and between the Kobs SBP and the Kmic SBP was -1.96±1.7. We also examined the correlation of the PPG signal and the Kmic signal and found that the mean correlation between the pulses amplitude in the first 20 pulses was 0.824±0.096. A high correlation is also obtained when an auscultatory gap occurs: When there is an ausculatory gap, the pulses in the PPG and in the electronic recording both simultaneously show several pulses, then no pulses, and then pulses return in both.

Eran Shalom
Eran Shalom
Jerusalem College of Technology








Powered by Eventact EMS