Presenting Symptoms in Acute Myocardial Infarction – Temporal Trends

Yoav Hammer Cardiology department, Rabin medical center, Beilinson campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Alon Eisen Cardiology department, Rabin medical center, Beilinson campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel David Hasdai Cardiology department, Rabin medical center, Beilinson campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Ilan Goldenberg The Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Israeli Association for Cardiovascular Trials, Sheba Medical Center, Israel Nir Shlomo Israeli Association for Cardiovascular Trials, Sheba Medical Center, Israel Roy Beigel The Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel Ran Kornowski Cardiology department, Rabin medical center, Beilinson campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Zaza Iakobishvili Cardiology department, Rabin medical center, Beilinson campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Introduction - Although typical chest pain is considered a cardinal clinical feature required for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), many patients present with atypical complaints. The full extent and implication of this phenomenon is largely unknown.

Aim – To evaluate the possible relationship and temporal trends between the presenting symptoms and outcomes in patients with AMI.

Methods – We used the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) in order to compare patients who presented with typical chest pain to patients who presented with an atypical complaints – dyspnea, non-specific chest pain, arrhythmia or syncope. To examine the temporal trends we compared the period of 2000-2006 with the period of 2008-2016.

Results – During the period of 2000-2016, 10,793 patients with ACS were enrolled. Of them, 6751 patients (62%) presented with typical chest pain, 2120 (19%) with atypical complaints, and 1922 (17%) with both. Patients with typical chest pain were younger, more commonly males, had less comorbidities, sought medical contact and underwent PCI faster than patients with atypical complaints (p<0.001 for each). Compared with patients with atypical complaints, patients with typical chest pain displayed decreased in hospital, 30 day and 1 year mortality (2.3% Vs 7.5%, 2.9% Vs 8.8%,6.5% Vs 17.7% respectively, p<0.001). While 1 year mortality decreased significantly over the years in patients with typical chest pain (8.7% Vs 4.4%, p<0.001), it hasn`t changed significantly in patients who presented with atypical complaints (20.5% Vs 21.1%, p=0.9). These results were consistent among STEMI and Non-STE-ACS patients, separately.

Conclusion – ACS patients who present with typical chest pain have a favorable outcome compared with patients who present with atypical complaints. Moreover, ACS patients who presented with atypical complaints failed to show an improvement in outcome over the last 2 decades. Identification and improved guideline based therapy of these high-risk patients might improve their future outcome.

Click the link to view image: https://events.eventact.com/dan/29113/104218.jpg
Yoav Hammer
Yoav Hammer








Powered by Eventact EMS