Guideline Recommended Therapies and Clinical Outcomes According to the Risk for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events after an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Yoav Hammer Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Zaza Iakobishvili Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel David Hasdai Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Ilan Goldenberg The Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Israeli Association for Cardiovascular Trials, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Nir Shlomo Israeli Association for Cardiovascular Trials, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Ran Kornowski Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Alon Eisen Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Introduction: Patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events. Although guideline-recommended therapies reduce the rate of recurrent CV events, patients who are at increased risk are often paradoxically undertreated. The TIMI risk score for secondary prevention (TRS2oP), a recently validated tool, incorporates 9 clinical risk-factors and stratifies patients by the risk for recurrent CV events after an ACS. We aimed to examine the management, clinical outcomes, and temporal trends of patients with ACS stratified by the TRS2oP, and identify risk-groups who particularly might benefit from optimal therapy.

Methods: Included were patients with ACS enrolled in the biennial ACS Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) between 2008-2016. Patients were stratified by the TRS 2oP to low (score 0-1), intermediate (2), and high-risk (≥3). Clinical outcomes included 30d MACE (death, MI, stroke, unstable angina, stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization) and 1-year mortality.

Results: Of 6827 ACS patients enrolled, 35% were low-risk, 27% intermediate- risk and 38% high-risk. Compared with the other risk-groups, high-risk patients were older, more commonly women, had more renal dysfunction, heart failure, and a higher grace score (p<0.001 for each). High-risk patients were treated less commonly with guideline-recommended therapies during hospitalization (PCI) and at discharge (statins, DAPT, cardiac rehabilitation). High-risk patients had higher 30d MACE, 30d mortality and 1y mortality (1.7% low-risk, 4.6% intermediate-risk, and 16.1% high-risk; p<0.001). Over the last decade, utilization of guideline-recommended therapies has increased among all risk-groups (Table). However, the rate of 30d MACE and 1-year mortality has decreased among patients at high-risk, but not among patients at low and intermediate-risk (Table).

Conclusion: Despite an improvement in the management of high-risk ACS patients, they are still undertreated with guideline-recommended therapies. Nevertheless, the outcome of high-risk ACS patients has significantly improved in the last decade, thus they should not be denied these therapies.

Click the link to view image: https://events.eventact.com/dan/29113/104321.jpg
Yoav Hammer
Yoav Hammer








Powered by Eventact EMS