Background: The optimal treatment modality for patients with low flow low gradient (LFLG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) is unknown.
Objedtives: To compare clinical outcome of patients with LFLG severe AS following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Methods: 276 patients with LFLG severe as underwent SAVR or TAVR between 2006 -2017 at our center. Two groups were identified: true LFLG AS (n= 62, 23%) and paradoxical LFLG-AS (n = 214, 77%). The median follow up was 475(129-1211) days.
Conclusions: In patients with LFLG-AS, a better hemodynamic profile was noted with TAVR compared with SAVR, both in true and paradoxical LFLG AS patients. In the entire cohort, survival was comparable for SAVR and TAVR, but better for patients aged ≥ 75 yrs. Our data suggest that TAVR should be the preferred treatment modality.
Click the link to view image: | https://events.eventact.com/dan/29113/104231.jpg |