Background
All bone anchored devices suffer from device limitations in the form of low maximum force output (MFO). The MFO will determine how much the speech signal is distorted due to saturation. Recent developments include sound processors with significantly higher MFO.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to compare listening effort, as estimated via pupillometry, during a speech intelligibility task in BAHS users wearing three different processors: Ponto Pro (PP), Ponto 3 (P3), and Ponto 3 Super Power (P3SP). The hypothesis was that listeners would allocate lower listening effort with the P3SP than with the PP, as a consequence of a higher MFO and less distortions in the signal.
Methods
Pupil dilations were recorded during a speech intelligibility task, at an individually adjusted signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) leading to 95% correct. The three processors were tested in random order with a single-blinded experimental design. Two conditions were tested at the same SNR, with Condition 2 tested at -5 dB overall sound level relative to Condition 1.
Results
The P3SP led to higher speech intelligibility than the PP in both conditions. Lower pupil dilations, indicating a decrease in listening effort, were obtained with the P3SP relative to the PP in condition 1. In condition 2, the effect of processor on pupil dilation was not significant.
Conclusions
An increase in speech intelligibility and a decrease in listening effort were obtained with the P3SP relative to the PP, suggesting that the increase in MFO may help BAHS users in their everyday listening scenarios.