ICS84

Probing linewidths and biexciton quantum yields of single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals in solution

Hendrik Utzat Katherine Shulenberger Odin Achorn Michel Nasilowski Moungi Bawendi
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

Cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs, e.g. CsPbX3 X=Cl, Br, I) have become one of the most promising nano-material for a plethora of optoelectronic applications such as LEDs, light down-conversion, and low-threshold lasing.[1] Despite their tremendous success, our understanding of the fundamental excited state dynamics in single PNCs is still very limited. Their poor photo-stability has hampered single nanocrystal spectroscopic interrogation, and only a handful of studies - all on the least unstable PNCs in the weak confinement regime - have reported biexciton quantum yields and single PNC emission spectra. [2,3] As a result, the linewidth broadening mechanism, and Auger recombination dynamics - in particular for confined PNCs - remain elusive.

Here we report the first comprehensive spectroscopic survey of single PNCs, including highly confined and blue emitting PNCs previously inaccessible to single NC spectroscopy. Using solution-phase photon-correlation-Fourier spectroscopy (s-PCFS), we gauge the effect of inhomogeneous broadening and identify the single PNC emission linewidths. With anti-bunching measurements in solution (solution-g(2)) we investigate the biexciton quantum yield in the absence of particle photo-degradation, and under low-flux excitation conditions.[5] For the first time, we identify clear trends in the single NC linewidth and underlying Auger rates with size and halide composition. These results highlight the power of advanced photon-correlation spectroscopy to study nanomaterial photo-physics.

1) L. Protesescu et al. Nano Lett. 2015,15,6.

2) G. Raino et al., ACS Nano, 2016, 10,2485-2490.

3) Y. Park et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 10, 10386-10393.

4) F. Hu et al., ACS Nano., 2015, 9,12, 12410-12416.

5) H.Utzat et al. Nano Lett., 2017, 17, pp 6838–6846.









Powered by Eventact EMS