Can CT Features of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis Aid in Therapeutic Decision between Conservative and Surgical Approach?

Yehonatan Bar Moshe 1 Nurith Hiller 1 Ala’a Abubeih 2 Jacob Sosna 1 Naama Lev-Cohain 1
1Department of Radiology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
2Department of General Surgery Mount Scoups, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Purpose:

To identify whether CT characteristics of acute appendicitis (AA) differ between patients with successful and unsuccessful conservative therapy.

Materials and Methods:

316 CT exams performed in patients with AA between July 2017 and April 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients who were surgically treated within 48 hours of diagnosis (168/316) or presented with complicated appendicitis (10/316) were excluded. Mean age of 130/316 patients included was 28 years (range 12-68), with F\M ratio of 1:1.1. The patients divided into two groups according to their clinical outcome: group A- successful conservative non-surgical treatment and group B- failure of conservative treatment resulting in an appendectomy within one year of initial diagnosis or re-hospitalization. Comparison of CT characteristics included maximum diameter of appendix, extent of appendix involvement, appendix wall thickening and enhancement pattern, major fat stranding, presence of cecal base or ileal bowel wall-thickening, lymphadenopathy and free fluid. Paired samples t-tests, chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results:

Group A included 90/130 patients (69%), and group B included 40/130 (31%). In-group B mean period for recurrence was 120 days (Median- 94). Twelve patients in group A didn’t receive contrast agent in their CT scan.

There was major increase in extent of appendix involvement (75% vs. 55%, P < 0.05) and free fluid (42% vs. 20%, P < 0.05) in group A compared to group B. In contrast major fat stranding (25% vs. 45%, P < 0.05) and full wall enhancement (36% vs. 55%), were significantly decreased in group A compared to group B (P < 0.05). The rest of the findings were similar in both groups.

Conclusion:

Our findings, may aid in clinical decision when a conservative treatment for uncomplicated AA is considered.

Yehonatan Bar Moshe
Yehonatan Bar Moshe








Powered by Eventact EMS