The 67th Annual Conference of the Israel Heart Society

Sex differences in implantable cardiac defibrillators in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

Mady Moriel Michael Ilan Rivka Farkash Moshe Rav Acha Aharon Medina Michael Glikson Yoav Michowitz
Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Israel

Bacground: Prior studies demonstrated that women (W) eligible for a primary prevention implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) are less likely to receive one as compared to men (M).

Aim: To assess the rates of ICD implantations among W and M with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) <35% and its outcome.

Methods: Retrospective analyses of ICDs implantations among patients with echocardiographic LVEF<35% between 1/1/2005-1/10/2019 in our center were performed.

Results: The study included 2441 patients with LVEF<35%, 572(23%) W. As compared to M, W were older (71+15 vs 69+14 yrs, respectively p=0.001), had similar frequency of diabetes (30% vs 33% % respectively), more hypertension (61% vs 53% respectively, p=0.008), less ischemic heart disease (IHD) (49% vs 67% respectively, p<0.0001), similar congestive heart failure (CHF) (38% vs 35% respectively), more renal failure (18% vs 11% respectively ,p=0.002). ICD implantation was performed in 76 (13%) W as compared to 476 (26%) M, p<0.0001

A multivariate logistic regression model including clinical characteristics revealed that female sex was independently associated with lower rate of ICD implantation, OR=0.44;95%CI [0.32-0.61];p<0.0001

During a median follow up of 578[89-1554] days, 280 W and 874 M died, 54% of W vs 51% of M without ICD, and 32% vs 39% respectively with ICD.

Multivariable COX models revealed that after correction for clinical characteristics ICD implantation was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality rates for both W and M, HRs [95%Cis], p-values: 0.51[0.31-0.82]; 0.006 and:0.64[0.53-0.77] ; <0.0001, respectively. No association was found between gender and mortality, HR=1.06; 95%CI[0.89-1.26], p=0.5.

Conclusions: In our cohort W eligible for ICD implantation were less likely to receive it as compared to M. ICD implantation is a life-saving procedure and its use should be increased both in W and M, however, a special effort should be deployed to abolish sex-related gaps.









Powered by Eventact EMS