הכינוס השנתי הדיגיטלי של החברה הישראלית לפדיאטריה קלינית - חיפ"ק 2021

The Advice4U Study: Insulin Dose Optimization Using an Automated Artificial Intelligence-based Decision Support System in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes

רויטל נימרי 1 Tadej Battelino 2 Lori M Laffel 3 Robert H Slover 4 Desmond Schatz 5 Stuart A Weinzimer 6 Klemen Dovc 2 Thomas Danne 7 Moshe Phillip 1
1The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel, ישראל
2Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC-University Children's Hospital Ljubljana, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, סלובניה
3Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Place, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Place, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, ארצות הברית
4Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, ארצות הברית
5Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, ארצות הברית
6Pediatric Endocrinology & Diabetes, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, Pediatric Endocrinology & Diabetes, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, ארצות הברית
7Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Children's Hospital AUF DER BULT, Hannover, Germany, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Children's Hospital AUF DER BULT, Hannover, Germany, גרמניה

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing adoption of insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring devices, most people with type 1 diabetes do not achieve their glycemic goals. This could be related to a lack of expertise or inadequate clinicians’ time to analyze complex sensor-augmented pump data. We tested whether frequent insulin dose adjustments guided by an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) is as effective and safe as those guided by physicians in controlling glucose levels. METHODS: ADVICE4U was a 6-month, multicenter, multinational, parallel, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in 108 participants with type 1 diabetes, aged 10-21 years and using insulin pump therapy. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive remote insulin dose adjustment every 3 weeks guided by either an AI-DSS, (AI-DSS arm, n=54) or by physicians (physician arm, n=54). RESULTS: The percentage of time spent within target glucose range (70 to 180 mg/dl), in the AI-DSS arm was statistically non-inferior to the physician arm (50.2±11.1% vs. 51.6±11.3%, respectively, P<1e-7). The percentage of readings below 54 mg/dl within the AI-DSS arm was statistically non-inferior to the physician arm (1.3±1.4% vs. 1.0±0.9%, respectively, P<0.0001). Three severe adverse events related to diabetes were reported in the physician arm and none in the AI-DSS arm. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an automated tool for treatment optimizing was non-inferior to intensive insulin titration provided by physicians from specialized academic diabetes centers. The AI-DSS provides opportunities for a new modality for intensive insulin management necessary to improve glucose control in young people with type 1 diabetes.