The 68th Annual Conference of the Israel Heart Society in association with the Israel Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Worse Outcomes of ACS Patients Without Versus With Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Arthur Shiyovich 1 Tal Cohen 2 Ashraf Hamdan 1 Robert Klempfner 2 Keren Skalsky 1 Avital Porter 1 Katia Orvin 1 Ran Kornowski 1 Alon Eisen 1
1Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Israel
2Cardiology, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Introduction: Approximately 5-15% patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have no traditional cardiovascular risk factors (RFs).

Objectives: To evaluate the management, outcomes and time dependent changes of ACS patients without RFs.

Methods: Evaluation of clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes as well as time dependent changes (by 3 time periods: early [2000-2006], mid [2008-2013], and late [2016-2018]) of ACS patients without RFs (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of IHD and current or past smoking) or known coronary artery disease, enrolled in the biennial ACS Israeli Surveys (ACSIS). We compared ACS patients without RFs (RF-) to those ≥1 RFs (RF+).

Results: Overall 583/10,324 (5.6%) eligible ACS patients were RF- (median age 64 [IQR 52-77], 25% females]. The RF- group were older, more educated, with lower BMI and prevalence of another cardiovascular comorbidity and chronic kidney disease compared with the RF+ group. The in-hospital PCI rates were lower among the RF- vs. the RF+ group (55% vs. 66%, respectively p<0.001). The rate of in-hospital complications was greater in the RF- vs. RF+ group (31.4% vs. 26.1%, respectively p=0.006). The rates of 30-day MACE were significantly higher among patients with RF- vs. RF+ (18.1% vs.12.8%, respectively p<0.001). Similarly, the rates of 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality (figure 1) were higher among patients with RF- vs. RF+ (8.7% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001 and 11.9% vs. 7.7% p<0.001 respectively). A trend of decline in the rate of MACE was observed between the early and the late study period in the RF- group (22% vs. 10.7% p=0.002 respectively

Conclusions: ACS patients without traditional cardiovascular risk factors comprise a unique group with reduced prevalence of comorbidities yet significantly worse short-and long-term outcomes. Additional research to identify unique risk factors and targets for interventions to improve outcomes of this group of patients is warranted.

 Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves of one-year all-cause mortality among ACS patients with and without traditional cardiovascular risk factors.









Powered by Eventact EMS