The 68th Annual Conference of the Israel Heart Society in association with the Israel Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Rivaroxaban treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation

Anat Berkovitch 1,2 Tal Cohen 1,2 Avishay Grupper 1,2 Romana Herscovici 1,2 Fernando Chernomordik 1,2 Roy Beinart 1,2 Roy Beigel 1,2 Robert Klempfner 1,2 Shlomi Matetzky 1,2
1Division of Cardiology, Leviev Heart and Vascular Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israel
2Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) the prevalence of renal dysfunction is high, with approximately 60% having at least moderate impairment. Moreover, among AF patients renal failure is associated with both high risk of thrombotic complications as well as bleedings in those treated with OAC.

Objectives: To compare the characterize and outcomes of AF patients with renal impermeant who were treated with Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin.

Methods: The study included 1,567 patients with non-valvular AF and renal impairment. Inclusion criteria were Rivaroxaban or Warfarin prescription, according to physician discretion and renal impairments defined as eGFR below 60ml/min/BSA. Only patients with appropriately prescribed Rivaroxaban dosage were included. Primary endpoint was 1 year mortality. Secondary endpoint was a composite of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding and myocardial infarction at 1-year.

Results: Mean age of the study population was 77±10 of whom 53% were male. The Warfarin group included 917 (58.5%) patients and the Rivaroxaban group included 650 (41.4%) patients. Patients in the Warfarin group had higher creatinine levels (1.7mg/dl vs. 1.3md/dl, p<0.001), and were more likely to have had heart failure (37% vs. 31%, p=0.02). In contrast, patients in the Rivaroxaban group had significantly more prevalence of diabetes mellitus (40% vs. 33%, p=0.009), hypertension (75% vs. 65%, p<0.001) and higher CHADSVASC score (4.3 vs. 4.1, p=0.036). Kaplan-Meier’s survival analysis showed a significantly lower cumulative probability of 1-year mortality among the Rivaroxaban group (p<0.001). Mortality crude rates discovered similar results (12% vs. 18%, p=0.003), with a trend towards lower rates of the composite endpoint (17% vs. 21%, p=0.11). Multivariate analysis found Rivaroxaban to be associated with 30% reduced risk of mortality (HR 0.7, 95%CI 0.52-0.93, p=0.013).

Conclusions: Appropriately prescribed Rivaroxaban for patients with renal dysfunction and non-valvular AF is associated with improved survival with good efficacy and safety profile compared to Warfarin.









Powered by Eventact EMS