Background: In this study we wanted to test the effectiveness of a training method on combat fighters that can replace running for maintaining aerobic and anaerobic capacity and normal body weight.
Such a training method is necessary to maintain combat fitness where and when running is not possible.
The study included 60 male subjects in mandatory service aged 20-23 (mean age 20.45 years). The subjects were divided into two groups: the control group (30 subjects) who trained regularly with training that combined running with strength training, and the intervention group (30 subjects) who performed only exercises – agility and strength training, and avoided long-distance runs (over 60 meters).
Aim: To examine how a six-week intervention program that includes high-intensity interval training as an alternative to running training, has an effect on maintaining the fighter`s physical fitness.
Methods: This study is a prospective intervention study using an unblinded randomly-controlled trial.
A. The intervention group: practiced three sessions per week that did not include duration runs, each training incorporating a wide range of muscle groups and was performed at short intervals with short recovery times between sets.
B. Control group: this group exercised according to the program of three workouts per week, with each workout including running (according to the training bar – 5-8 km) and strength training to be performed in sets with breaks, until a resting pulse.