Objectives: Infants with Non-IgE mediated food allergy are followed by primary pediatricians, gastroenterologists, or immunologists. We hypothesized that there are practice variations between those disciplines in the care of infants with non-IgE mediated cow`s milk protein allergy.
Methods: A computerized questionnaire was distributed between pediatric gastroenterologists and immunologists. The questions addressed diagnosis, management, and follow-up in three scenarios of infants with concern for food protein induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP).
Results: Fifty eights pediatric gastroenterologists and 32 immunologists completed the questionnaire. The first case illustrated an infant consuming cow’s milk-based formula, who presented with symptoms suggestive of FPIAP. Eighty three percent of gastroenterologists recommended to transfer the patient to an extensively hydrolyzed formula and only 10% recommended just follow up without dietary changes, in contrast to 41% and 28% of immunologists, respectively (P<0.001). In a breast-fed infant, about 50% of gastroenterologists and immunologists advised that the mother restrains from milk products, but 22% of gastroenterologists vs. 45% of immunologists recommended just follow up (P=0.02). Re-challenge to confirm diagnosis was recommended by only 35% and 50% of gastroenterologists and immunologists, respectively (P=0.02). Time of re-exposure of these infants to cow’s milk products was recommended by most immunologists as early as age ≤6 months, while most gastroenterologists recommended it at 9-12 months of age (P=0.002).
Conclusions: We identified lack of adherence to guidelines and differences in diagnosis and management of non-IgE mediated cow’s milk allergy between pediatric gastroenterology and immunology subspecialties. Joint guidelines should be published and implemented by both groups of physicians.