
Background: Traditional milestones in language development suggest that language acquisition occurs analytically: first, we learn words, and then we manipulate grammatical rules to form sentences. However, since the 1980s, some authors (PETTERS, 1977; PRIZANT, 1981) identified a group of autistic children who did not follow this predictable developmental path. Instead, these children acquired language through situational chunks, which they later transformed into manipulable words. These children were labeled as Gestalt Language Processors.
Objective: This study aims to review the literature to provide a historical overview of how gestalt language processing has been described, explore how different authors define this phenomenon as a natural way of acquiring language, and examine current scientific perspectives.
Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted using the databases BVS, PubMed, and Scielo, with the following MESH descriptors: "Language AND Gestalt Processor," "Language x Delayed Echolalia," and "Gestalt Language Processors x Natural Language Acquisition," combined using the boolean operator “AND."
Results: The literature presents two theoretical perspectives on language processing. Gestalt processing was first described by Petters in 1977 as occurring in children with rigid cognitive patterns, a viewpoint shared by Prizant and colleagues in the 1980s. In 2012, Blanc expanded on this concept, defining gestalt processing as a natural mechanism of language acquisition not limited to autistic children. She outlined six stages, ranging from situational gestalt chunks to normative grammatical operations. In 2024, various researchers revisited these studies, highlighting the limitations of Blanc’s framework and questioning the overemphasis on neurodiversity narratives.
Conclusion: The literature suggests the existence of multiple pathways for language acquisition, including both analytic and gestalt processing. However, there is no consensus on whether gestalt language acquisition is a natural model or a characteristic feature of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder or other executive function challenges.
Further empirical research is needed to clarify this complex puzzle of human language acquisition and its individual variations.