A Qualitative Analysis of Contract Cheating Websites in Chilean Higher Education: Insights on the Professionalism Fallacy and Neutralization Strategies

A Qualitative Analysis of Contract Cheating Websites in Chilean Higher Education: Insights on the Professionalism Fallacy and Neutralization Strategies

Synopsis

This study examines how Chilean contract-cheating websites exploit a professionalism fallacy to mimic legitimate e-commerce and academic support services. By reframing illicit outsourcing as pedagogical help, these platforms offer students with neutralization strategies that rationalize academic dishonesty as a standard professional practice.

Keywords

Contract Cheating; Academic Integrity; Higher Education; Hispanic South America

Introduction

Contract cheating, defined as outsourcing academic work to third parties with the intent to submit it as one`s own (Clarke & Lancaster, 2006; Curtis & Clare, 2017), has emerged as a critical threat to academic integrity in global higher education. Contract cheating undermines the core values of fairness, courage, trust, honesty, respect, and responsibility (ICAI, 2021). While global prevalence is estimated at 2.2%-15.7% (Curtis & Tremayne, 2021; Foltýnek & Králíková, 2018; Newton, 2018), these figures likely represent only the tip of the iceberg due to detection difficulties (Rogerson, 2017; Tomar, 2015).

Despite extensive international literature, a significant gap persists in Hispanic South America, particularly in Chile. The Chilean higher education system has recently undergone profound institutional, legal, and regulatory transformations aimed at strengthening institutional autonomy and quality assurance (BCNC, 2018a; CNA, 2021). However, little is known about how commercial actors exploit these shifting environments. This study explores how contract cheating services market theses-related services to Chilean students.

Methodology

Adopting a qualitative, interpretive design (Crotty, 1998; Denzin & Lincoln, 2018), this study investigates the online portrayal of contract cheating services in Chile. Data collection was conducted from October 2025 to March 2026 via a structured web-search protocol on the Chilean version of Google, using incognito mode. Following established methodologies (e.g., Kaktiņš, 2018; Lancaster, 2020; Lancaster & Salasevicus, 2023), searches utilized a scripted combination of Spanish keywords involving action terms (e.g., advice and buy), academic outputs (e.g., undergraduate theses), and OECD (2015) based disciplinary fields (e.g., natural sciences and engineering).

Data analysis involved two iterative cycles of coding (Saldaña, 2013). Descriptive coding categorized service qualities, while axial coding explored relationships between marketing portrayals and their broader ethical implications.

Findings

Chilean companies use a “veneer of specialization,” tailoring to specific disciplines while maintaining generic menu structures to maximize market reach. In line with this insight, contract cheating websites emphasize staff expertise, professional specialization, or large pools of available writers.

Some contract cheating providers frame their services as academic support, actively blurring the distinction between legitimate guidance and illicit outsourcing. Bait-and-switch strategies are prevalent, in which words such as "advice" and "help" conceal the true nature of these services. These websites offer testimonials that, while appearing inauthentic, target students’ anxieties about performance and deadlines. These narratives offer compelling rationalizations, inviting students to frame misconduct as self-care or as a necessity.

Preliminary Conclusions

The systematic deception about the legitimacy of these services is pursued through a professionalism fallacy and neutralization strategies.

Professionalism Fallacy

The structural mimicry of legitimate e-commerce, including customer support and secure payment gateways, creates a professionalism fallacy. When websites look as authoritative as their universities` official portals, the transaction’s weight is diminished. The services frame themselves as partners, deceiving students into believing that purchasing a thesis is a standard, albeit paid, part of the degree-seeking process.

Neutralization Strategies

These websites rarely use the word “cheating.” Instead, they employ a semantic shift, using terms such as pedagogical support or learning guide. By adopting the university register, they provide students neutralization strategies. This allows students to rationalize their behaviour not as a breach of ethics, but as a professional outsourcing of a task to a subject matter expert.

Implications

These preliminary perspectives indicate that addressing contract cheating in Chile requires more than improved detection. It necessitates a systemic re-evaluation of how universities communicate the value of the learning process. These services capitalize on the gap between students’ anxiety and institutional expectations. If these companies continue to successfully masquerade as legitimate educational aids, the intrinsic value of Chilean higher education qualifications remains at risk.

References

Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. (2018a). Ley 21.091 sobre educación superior. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=1118991

Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. (2018b). Ley 20.129 establece un sistema de aseguramiento de la calidad de educación superior. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?i=255323

Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788

Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism: Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Proceedings of the Second International Plagiarism Conference. Gateshead, United Kingdom.

Comisión Nacional de Acreditación. (2021). Búsqueda avanzada de acreditaciones. https://www.cnachile.cl/Paginas/buscador-avanzado.aspx

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications.

Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J. (2017). How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extend are students repeat offenders? Journal of Academic Ethics, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9278-x

Curtis, G. J., & Tremayne, K. (2021). Is plagiarism really on the rise? Results from four 5-yearly surveys. Studies in Higher Education, 46(9), 1816–1826. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1707792

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Foltýnek, T., & Králíková, V. (2018). Analysis of the contract cheating market in Czechia. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0027-8

International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). https://academicintegrity.org/images/pdfs/20019_ICAI-Fundamental-Values_R12.pdf

Kaktiņš, L. (2018). Contract cheating advertisements: What they tell us about international students’ attitudes to academic integrity. Ethics and Education, 13(2), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2017.1412178

Lancaster, T. (2020). Academic discipline integration by contract cheating services and essay mills. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09357-x

Lancaster, T. E., & Salasevicius, M. (2023). An international comparison of discipline integration of the commercial contract cheating industry. RELIEVE – Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 29(2), Article M3. https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29227

Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 3, 67. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00067

OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. OECD Publishing.

Rogerson, A. M. (2017). Detecting contract cheating in essay and report submissions: Process, patterns, clues and conversations. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0021-6

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Tomar, D. A. (2015). Former academic ghostwriter, “The Shadow Scholar,” David A. Tomar joins TheBestSchools.org staff [Press release]. PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/former-academic-ghostwriter-the-shadow-scholar-david-a-tomar-joins-thebestschoolsorg-staff-300016976.html