THE ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS REQUIRED FOR THE ERADICATION OF PRIMARY SOLID TUMORS BY ELECTRIC BASED-ABLATION

Ilan Hochman 1,2 Hila Confino 2 Margalit Efrati 2 Jenny Tikochkiy 2 Rafi Korenstein 1 Yona Keisari 2
1Departments of Physiology & Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv
2Departments of Clinical Microbiology & Immunology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv

Background and objectives: Ablation is an alternative nonsurgical local treatment, which is used for in situ destruction of solid tumors. We developed pulse alternate electric current based treatment for in-situ tumor ablation (Pulsed Electric Current Tumor Ablation-PECTA), which effectively eliminated primary tumors by low currents conducted through one or more thin electrodes. PECTA may affect the tumor tissue by a number of different mechanisms such as: pH changes, electric field, heat, gas formation and free radicals. In this study we examined the electrical properties essential for PECTA.

Methods: Balb/c mice bearing subcutaneous tumors were treated by PECTA or surgery as control. Two tumor types were tested: the weak immunogenic mammary adenocarcinoma (DA3) and the immunogenic colon carcinoma (CT26). PECTA was applied by intratumoral electrodes delivering 25-100 coulomb per electrode per cm3 (C/E/cm3) of tumor tissue. The efficiency of ablation was tested by measuring the elimination of the primer tumor and prevention of local or marginal recurrence

Results: First we demonstrated that ablation efficiency by pulsed current (PECTA) was superior to continuous current. Next we found that efficient and predictable tumor destruction can be achieved by controlling the coulomb delivered to the tumor. An optimal result of ~ 100% cure level was obtained when 100 C/E/cm3 were transferred to the tumor. An important and interesting finding was that the ablation efficiency was dependent on the electrode charge (polarity) inserted into the tumor. When using the same coulomb per tissue mass, the anode was more effective for tumor ablation than the cathode: For colon adenocarcinoma (CT26) and breast carcinoma (DA3) tumors the cure level by the anode was about twice than the cure level achieved by the cathode. Electric current treatment by anode and cathode together had an intermediate effect on both tumor types.

Conclusions: These findings suggest an alternative simple, powerful and affordable ablation tool for treating solid tumors.








 




Powered by Eventact EMS